|
Comparison of Databases
Sr.
No. |
Name |
No-SQL |
Open
Source |
Year
Found |
API / Drivers
Language |
Shardable |
Supported By |
Major Users |
| 1 |
Oracle |
No |
No |
1980 |
Java |
Yes, but costly |
Oracle |
Many many companies |
| 2 |
MySQL |
No |
Yes |
1995 |
Several |
Yes, using MySQL Cluster |
Oracle |
Wikipedia, Facebook, Google,
Twitter, Flickr, Youtube
|
| 3 |
PostgreSQL |
No |
Yes |
1995 |
. |
. |
PostgreSQL Global
Development Group |
. |
No-SQL Databases
(Note how recent these databases are)
|
| 4 |
Couch DB |
Yes |
Yes |
2005, 2008 |
JavaScript |
Yes |
Apache |
BBC, Credit Suisse, Meebo |
| 5 |
MongoDB |
Yes |
Yes |
2007 |
Several Languages |
Yes |
10gen |
Metlife, Craigslist, SAP, Forbes,
Sourceforge, eBay,
Shutterfly (18 billion pics in 2013)
|
Others Databases
(Most of these other-than-SQL systems have started popping in the last decade only)
|
| 6 |
Cassandra |
Hybrid between Key-Value
and tabular database |
Yes |
2008 |
Java, Python and Node.JS |
Yes, Readily Scalable |
Facebook,
Now Apache |
Cisco's WebEx, Digg,
Facebook used, then switched to HBase
Netflix for streaming movies,
Twitter |
| 7 |
Solr |
. |
Yes |
2004 |
Java, HTTP and
many others |
Yes, with SolrCloud |
Apache |
. |
| 8 |
Hadoop |
. |
Yes |
2005 |
Java |
. |
Apache |
Yahoo claimed 10k Hadoop cluster in 2008
Facebook claimed storing 100 PB of data in 2012
More than half of Fortune 50 use Hadoop.
|
| 9 |
Redis |
In-Memory Key-Value Store |
Yes |
2009 |
Almost All |
. |
Pivotal |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
